HIV-Positive Group May Hold the Key to Defeating AIDS
Infected but not ill, 'elite controllers' make up less than
1% of those with the virus. They may hold the key to its cure.
By James Ricci, Times Staff Writer - July 6, 2006
SAN FRANCISCO — Matt Traywick's personal
life has been a treatise on how to contract AIDS.
A gay man, he'd been "very sexually active"
in San Francisco in the late 1970s, he said, and tended toward
unprotected encounters. Then he entered a long-term monogamous
relationship, and after he lost both it and his job as a computer
specialist, he sank into a life of hard revelry and so much
intravenous methamphetamine use that he wound up homeless
on the streets of the city's Tenderloin district.
"I always knew I would be HIV-positive," Traywick
recalled. "I hit all the major risk factors. It seemed
there was no way I would have been negative. When I tested
positive, my doctor cried and I didn't. Walking home, I wondered
if there was something psychologically broken in me because,
for some reason, I wasn't worried."
Against all logic and expectation, his nonchalance
has turned out to be justified.
Traywick was diagnosed 21 years ago and has
been healthy ever since, despite never having taken anti-HIV
medications. Antibody tests demonstrate conclusively that
he harbors the virus. But his immune system has controlled
it so effectively that repeated blood assays have never shown
a detectable level of the invader, even though Traywick still
occasionally uses speed and engages in unprotected sex.
A graying, rumpled man of 46 with darting
eyes and nervous hands, Traywick said he has "spent a
lot of time trying to figure out why I was a survivor. There's
got to be a reason some people are chosen not to die."
In the argot of AIDS research, Traywick is
an "elite controller." Elites are extremely rare,
accounting for an estimated one-third of 1% of known HIV-positive
people and numbering perhaps 2,000. They and so-called viremic
controllers, healthy infected people whose immune systems
keep the virus at very low, although detectable, levels in
the blood without drugs, are of keen interest to AIDS researchers.
"I would say we still don't have the
faintest idea why these people are doing as well as they are,"
said Harvard medical professor Bruce Walker, director of the
Partners AIDS Research Center at Massachusetts General Hospital.
"Achieving the state that these guys have reached in
their bodies — if we could do that through some intervention,
we would solve the AIDS epidemic."
Being a long-term controller is not an unalloyed blessing, as Kai Brothers' journey illustrates.
Brothers, 43, a computer technician for Wells Fargo bank in San Francisco, got his first indication
something was amiss in 1987. A frequent blood donor, he received a certified letter from his blood bank s
tating that someone had donated HIV-tainted blood and asking him to be tested.
Brothers couldn't bring himself to respond. As a gay man, he knew he was in a high-risk group. Eventually
he had himself tested but couldn't face learning the results. It was 1989 before he had himself retested,
confirming his suspicions.
"I deep-down knew," he said in a recent interview. "There was a heavy feeling but not a surprise or shock.
There was fear: 'Am I getting sick? How long will it take before this time bomb went off?' "
Not knowing his future, he quit his job and cashed in his
401(k) account to travel in Europe. On his return, he learned
his infection-fighting T-cells - HIV's target - had dipped
slightly below the normal range, and his doctor wrote him
a prescription for AZT, the first effective HIV drug but one
with often dreadful side effects.
- Continued -